RigPlan

Desay X1.9i vs ROE Visual RB1.9F

1.953 mm against 1.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X1.9iROE Visual RB1.9F
ManufacturerDesayROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.953 mm1.95 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits1,100 nits
Refresh rate2,880 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet256 × 256256 × 256
Pixels per m²262,144262,144
Weight10.9 kg (44 kg/m²)8.6 kg (34 kg/m²)
Max power190 W (760 W/m²)240 W (960 W/m²)
Typical power67 W120 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X1.9iROE Visual RB1.9F
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,304 px4,096 × 2,304 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,770 kg1,319 kg
Load per point~708 kg across 3~528 kg across 3
Power, full white27.4 kW34.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1616
Data runs32 at ≤7/port32 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear6.5 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons