Which is lighter, Absen PL3.9 XL V10 or ROE Visual CB3 MkII?

ROE Visual CB3 MkII is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 315 kg of difference — 893 kg versus 1,208 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

ROE Visual CB3 MkII draws more: 833 W/m² against 540 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 21.6 kW versus 31.2 kW, and 8 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

ROE Visual CB3 MkII resolves finer: 71,111 pixels per square metre against 65,536 for Absen PL3.9 XL V10, 9% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 2,080 px across versus 2,048 px.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

Absen PL3.9 XL V10 vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

3.9 mm against 3.75 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Absen PL3.9 XL V10	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Manufacturer	Absen	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.9 mm	3.75 mm
Cabinet	500 × 1000 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Pixels per cabinet	128 × 256	160 × 320
Pixels per m²	65,536	71,111
Weight	12.6 kg (25 kg/m²)	14 kg (19 kg/m²)
Max power	270 W (540 W/m²)	600 W (833 W/m²)
Typical power	90 W	300 W
Max hang	10 panels	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Absen PL3.9 XL V10	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Wall built	16 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m	13 × 4 — 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	80 + 4 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	2,048 × 1,280 px	2,080 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,208 kg	893 kg
Load per point	~483 kg across 3	~357 kg across 3
Power, full white	21.6 kW	31.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	8	13
Data runs	6 at ≤15/port	7 at ≤10/port
Truck, linear	4.4 m	3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

ROE Visual CB3 MkII resolves finer: 71,111 pixels per square metre against 65,536 for Absen PL3.9 XL V10, 9% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 2,080 px across versus 2,048 px.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 315 kg of difference — 893 kg versus 1,208 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII draws more: 833 W/m² against 540 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 21.6 kW versus 31.2 kW, and 8 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Absen PL3.9 XL V10: 6 runs against 7, at 15 and 10 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 80 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for ROE Visual CB3 MkII against 4.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Absen PL3.9 XL V10 vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons