RigPlan

Absen PL2.9 V10 vs Desay X3.1

2.97 mm against 3.125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Absen PL2.9 V10Desay X3.1
ManufacturerAbsenDesay
Pixel pitch2.97 mm3.125 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits3,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°160° / 100°
Pixels per cabinet168 × 168160 × 160
Pixels per m²112,896102,400
Weight8 kg (32 kg/m²)10.5 kg (42 kg/m²)
Max power135 W (540 W/m²)190 W (760 W/m²)
Typical power45 W67 W
Max hang20 panelsnot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Absen PL2.9 V10Desay X3.1
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,688 × 1,512 px2,560 × 1,440 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,352 kg1,712 kg
Load per point~541 kg across 3~685 kg across 3
Power, full white19.4 kW27.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)816
Data runs8 at ≤18/port8 at ≤20/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons