Which is lighter, INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 or ROE Visual V8T?

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 is the lighter rig: 11 kg/m² against 18 kg/m². Across this wall that is 100 kg of difference — 720 kg versus 820 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

ROE Visual V8T draws more: 480 W/m² against 458 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 26.4 kW versus 19.2 kW, and 10 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 resolves finer: 14,400 pixels per square metre against 12,544 for ROE Visual V8T, 15% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 1,152 px across versus 896 px.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs ROE Visual V8T

8.33 mm against 8.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2	ROE Visual V8T
Manufacturer	INFiLED	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	8.33 mm	8.9 mm
Cabinet	1200 × 1200 mm	1000 × 1000 mm
Pixels per cabinet	144 × 144	112 × 112
Pixels per m²	14,400	12,544
Weight	15.5 kg (11 kg/m²)	18 kg (18 kg/m²)
Max power	660 W (458 W/m²)	480 W (480 W/m²)
Typical power	220 W	240 W
Max hang	not published	22 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2	ROE Visual V8T
Wall built	8 × 5 — 9.60 × 6.00 m	8 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed	40 + 2 spare	40 + 2 spare
Resolution	1,152 × 720 px	896 × 560 px
Weight incl. bumpers	720 kg	820 kg
Load per point	~216 kg across 4	~328 kg across 3
Power, full white	26.4 kW	19.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	10	8
Data runs	2 at ≤25/port	1 at ≤41/port
Truck, linear	3.3 m	2.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 9.60 × 6.00 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 resolves finer: 14,400 pixels per square metre against 12,544 for ROE Visual V8T, 15% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 1,152 px across versus 896 px.
INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 is the lighter rig: 11 kg/m² against 18 kg/m². Across this wall that is 100 kg of difference — 720 kg versus 820 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual V8T draws more: 480 W/m² against 458 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 26.4 kW versus 19.2 kW, and 10 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on ROE Visual V8T: 1 runs against 2, at 25 and 41 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 1200 × 1200 mm against 1000 × 1000 mm, so 40 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for ROE Visual V8T against 3.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs ROE Visual V8T

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons