Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9

0.9375 mm against 0.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Absen CL0.9 V3 resolves finer: 1,137,778 pixels per square metre against 1,101,068 for Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 8,320 px across versus 8,320 px.
• Absen CL0.9 V3 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 32 kg/m². Across this wall that is 405 kg of difference — 909 kg versus 1,314 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9 draws more: 693 W/m² against 425 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 14.5 kW versus 24.5 kW, and 7 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 91 data runs for this wall, though they carry 2 and 2 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Absen CL0.9 V3 — specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9 — specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Sharp LD-FE093
• Sharp LD-FE093 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Sharp LD-D091 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Sharp LD-D091
• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Sharp LD-EC091