Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.2

1.25 mm against 1.27 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Absen CL1.2 V3 resolves finer: 640,000 pixels per square metre against 619,351 for Unilumin UpanelS 1.2, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 6,240 px across versus 6,240 px.
• Absen CL1.2 V3 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 524 kg of difference — 909 kg versus 1,433 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.2 draws more: 669 W/m² against 400 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13.7 kW versus 23.7 kW, and 7 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 52 data runs for this wall, though they carry 4 and 4 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Absen CL1.2 V3 — specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.2 — specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSCB012
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.2
• LG LSCB012 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.2
• Sharp LD-FE123 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.2
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Sharp LD-FE123
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Sharp LD-D121